<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FFQF: Oath of Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newyorktraveler.net/ffqf-oath-of-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newyorktraveler.net/ffqf-oath-of-office/</link>
	<description>life and travels in Upstate New York</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eryn</title>
		<link>http://newyorktraveler.net/ffqf-oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-19782</link>
		<dc:creator>Eryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorktraveler.net/?p=1173#comment-19782</guid>
		<description>This is really a great feature.

Isn&#039;t it funny how people choose to read what they want into their oaths?

You can&#039;t please everyone, but I just wish they would stick to the ground rules that the people set in front of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a great feature.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny how people choose to read what they want into their oaths?</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t please everyone, but I just wish they would stick to the ground rules that the people set in front of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hercules Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://newyorktraveler.net/ffqf-oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-19745</link>
		<dc:creator>Hercules Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorktraveler.net/?p=1173#comment-19745</guid>
		<description>Great selections, Mrs. M, and great subject. Your post reminds me of Washington&#039;s presidential warning: &quot;Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.&quot;

Thanks for participating. Happy FFQF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great selections, Mrs. M, and great subject. Your post reminds me of Washington&#8217;s presidential warning: &#8220;Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for participating. Happy FFQF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akaGaGa</title>
		<link>http://newyorktraveler.net/ffqf-oath-of-office/comment-page-1/#comment-19744</link>
		<dc:creator>akaGaGa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorktraveler.net/?p=1173#comment-19744</guid>
		<description>Well done, Mrs. M.  Ron Paul occasionally chides our congress about the oath of office, but I&#039;m afraid &quot;oath&quot; has no meaning in our culture today.  In today&#039;s Newspeak, &quot;let your yes be yes, and your no be no&quot; has become &quot;tell &#039;em what they want to hear.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Mrs. M.  Ron Paul occasionally chides our congress about the oath of office, but I&#8217;m afraid &#8220;oath&#8221; has no meaning in our culture today.  In today&#8217;s Newspeak, &#8220;let your yes be yes, and your no be no&#8221; has become &#8220;tell &#8216;em what they want to hear.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

